Search MoVA


Bulletin Board (News)

It's Coming! It's Coming!
Register for the Annual Conference!

State and County Resources

National Resources

Resources by Topic

Outreach Project (Workshops)

Join MoVA

Renew Membership

Current MoVA Members

Current Board and Committee Chairs

MoVA Award Nominations

Tribute Fund

Contact MoVA

 

Site design and maintenance by Rod Garrett - 417.823.8075
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE



A crime committed against a person violates state law (though in certain circumstances it may also violate federal law), and thus, is a crime against the state. In Missouri, the prosecuting attorney for the county in which the crime occurred usually handles the case. The following information pertaining to criminal procedure, while specific to Missouri, is generally applicable to criminal prosecutions in most states. Differences may include the applicable time periods for filing notices of appeal or bringing post-conviction proceedings, and in the type of post-conviction actions available.

In a criminal case, the state has the burden of proving beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant committed the alleged crime. Defendants are presumed innocent and never have the burden of proving their innocence.


INVESTIGATION

Law enforcement personnel are responsible for investigating reports of criminal activity, gathering evidence upon such reports, making arrests if supported by that evidence, and presenting the evidence to the prosecuting attorney for consideration of further action. As a result of a police or sheriff's investigation, the following outcomes are possible: the law enforcement authority may decide that a crime has not occurred as defined under state law, they may determine that there is insufficient evidence to pursue the complaint, or one or more persons may be arrested and the matter referred to the appropriate prosecutor's office. Any arrest made prior to the issuance of a warrant requires that the person be released within 20 hours from the time of arrest unless a warrant is issued.


COMPLAINT AND ARREST

If there is evidence upon which the police deem constitutes an offense and is sufficient to identify a suspect, the matter is taken before the prosecuting attorney. As the legal representative for the State of Missouri in the county in which he was elected, the Prosecuting or Circuit Attorney must then determine whether and what formal charges to file. This is what is commonly referred to as "prosecutorial discretion."

Once a formal charge has been filed, usually in the form of a complaint, the prosecutor can go to a judge to obtain an arrest warrant. The court issues the warrant if there are sufficient facts to show probable cause that a felony has been committed by the defendant. This arrest warrant will allow local law enforcement officials to arrest the person named in the warrant on the suspicion that he has committed the crime set forth in the complaint.


PRELIMINARY HEARING (not held for misdemeanor cases)

Felony cases begin with a preliminary hearing -- a proceeding in which testimony is taken under oath. The defendant may waive a preliminary hearing. If the defendant chooses to proceed with a preliminary hearing, the judge, the defendant, the defendant's attorney, the prosecutor, and any victims or witnesses subpoenaed will attend.

At the preliminary hearing, the prosecutor presents evidence to show the judge that there is reasonable cause, or reason to believe, a crime was committed and that it was committed by the defendant.

The defense attorney can cross-examine the state's witnesses and produce evidence. If reasonable cause is established, the judge will order the defendant to be "bound over" for trial. If the defendant waives the preliminary hearing, the case usually will be sent directly to circuit court for trial.

If the judge decides that reasonable cause has not been established, the court dismisses the case and the defendant is released. This also may occur if witnesses fail to appear to testify. In some cases the prosecutor can later file another complaint against the defendant, based on the same crime.

At any point during the prosecution, the prosecutor may decide to voluntarily dismiss the charges. This is called a "nolle prosequi."


GRAND JURY

A grand jury replaces the preliminary hearing in certain cases as a method by which criminal charges can be filed. A grand jury is comprised of a panel of private citizens, chosen in a manner similar to the way in which trial juries are chosen, whose job is to look into allegations of criminal activity. Not every county in Missouri has a grand jury.

The prosecutor presents evidence to the grand jurors who decide whether a crime was committed and if the defendant could have committed it. Proceedings are closed to the public, in order to: 1) prevent the accused from absconding prior to his indictment and arrest or in tampering with the witnesses against him; 2) prevent disclosure of derogatory information against an accused who is not indicted; 3) encourage victims and witnesses to come before the grand jury without fear of retaliation; and 4) encourage grand jurors to engage in uninhibited investigation and deliberation. The accused does not have the right to be present unless subpoenaed, and may not present evidence on his own behalf. The grand jury has the power to issue a subpoena ad testificandum to compel the testimony of a witness, as well as a subpoena duces tecum that compels the production of documents and other tangible evidence. As with a preliminary hearing, the case is either "bound over" to the circuit court or the defendant is freed.


BAIL

A person charged with a bailable offense may be released pending trial on his personal recognizance unless the judge determines that such a release would not reasonably assure the appearance of the person as required. If a preliminary hearing is held and the defendant is bound over for trial, the issue of bail is addressed at that time. If there is not a preliminary hearing but instead an indictment is handed down from a grand jury, bail is addressed at the defendant's arraignment (see following section). Upon determining that the defendant can be released with reasonable assurance that he will appear as required, the judge may release the person on bail by imposing any number of conditions as specified under state law, (§ 544.455, RSMo (1994)).

Release on bail is not available for "capital offenses" -- i.e., where the accused is subject to punishment by death.


ARRAIGNMENT

This is the first formal presentation of charges to the defendant, who must enter a plea. Also, the judge can raise or lower the defendant's bond, if any. The arraignment is open to the public.

After arraignment, an assistant prosecuting attorney is assigned to the case (in the case of larger prosecutor offices). In some cases, the same prosecutor will be assigned from the onset and the case is added to a judge's docket.

The court sets a trial date and hearing dates on pretrial motions. The trial date may change because of requests for continuances in the case or because of other cases on the trial docket for that day.


PRETRIAL MATTERS
  1. Discovery

      "Discovery" refers to the process in which the State and the defense have the opportunity to obtain various information before trial. The purposes of the discovery rules are to provide the defendant with sufficient information to make an informed plea, to encourage thorough trial preparation, to avoid surprise at trial, to conserve judicial and professional resources, and to expedite case processing.

      Under the United States Constitution, the State must disclose to the defense exculpatory information -- i.e., information that is material to either the issue of guilt or punishment. The evidence is discoverable whether it constitutes impeachment evidence or is directly exculpatory, provided that there is a reasonable probability that the outcome of the trial would have been different if the evidence had been disclosed.

      Missouri state law also requires the disclosure of certain information (Missouri Supreme Court Rules 25.03 and 25.05), and if certain conditions are met, additional discovery may be permitted (Missouri Supreme Court Rules 25.04 and 25.06). A defendant may obtain the deposition of any person (Missouri Supreme Court Rule 25.12). When a child (a person under age seventeen) is the victim of an offense against the person, a victim of a sexual offense, or a victim of an offense against the family, the court upon motion of the prosecuting attorney, may exclude the defendant from any or all deposition proceedings (§ 491.685, RSMo.). Certain matters are expressly not subject to discovery pursuant to state law (Missouri Supreme Court Rule 25.10). In addition, the trial court may issue special protective orders upon motion and for good cause shown (Missouri Supreme Court Rule 25.11).


  2. Plea Bargaining

      "Plea bargaining" is the process in which the prosecution makes charging and sentencing concessions in exchange for a plea of guilty. The reasons for not taking a case to trial are varied, but generally may involve one or more of the following: to avoid further trauma to the victim -- for example, when the victim is a child who was sexually assaulted; when the victim, though prepared to testify, would prefer to put the entire matter behind him or her; in the case that the evidence is sufficient to support a conviction but other factors, such as issues of credibility, weigh in favor of accepting a plea; or where the defendant agrees to cooperate with the State in the prosecution of a co-defendant.

      Under Missouri law, the prosecutor may agree to any one of the following: 1) dismissal of other charges; 2) recommending or agreeing not to oppose the defendant's request for a particular sentence; 3) agreeing that the particular sentence is the appropriate result; or 4) making a recommendation for or agreeing on another case disposition. The trial court is not required to accept a plea agreement, but if the court rejects the agreement, the defendant must be given the opportunity to withdraw his guilty plea. To be valid, the guilty plea itself must be entered "knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily."


  3. Continuance
      A criminal proceeding may be continued for what is referred to as "good cause shown."



TRIAL
  1. Noncapital

      In all criminal cases, trial may be before a judge or jury, depending upon whether the defendant waived his right to a jury trial. Except in the case of a first degree murder trial where the death penalty is sought, all jury-tried cases include a general voir dire (jury selection procedure) and a guilt-phase. The jury may recommend a sentence unless the defendant is subject to sentencing solely by the court.


  2. Capital

      Only in the case of first degree murder can the state seek the death penalty. First degree murder requires that the defendant acted with deliberation. (§ 565.020, RSMo.).

      In a capital case jury selection occurs in two phases -- death qualification and general voir dire. During the death qualification voir dire, both the state and the defense may question venire men (prospective jurors) about their views on capital punishment. Both the State and the defense are entitled to an array of jurors that can consider the full range of punishment, including life without the possibility of probation or parole and death. A venire man is subject to a strike for cause when his or her views would substantially affect the ability to perform his or her duties as a juror. Through general voir dire, the parties may ask the venire men questions to understand their background, which aids in the exercise of the peremptory challenges (for any reason or no reason at all) each party has.

      Following voir dire is the guilt phase of the trial. Before presenting evidence, the prosecutor must make an opening statement, summarizing the evidence. The defense may make an opening statement after the prosecutors', or may elect to make their opening statement before presenting its own evidence.

      If the jury returns a guilty verdict, only then does the trial enter the penalty phase. Just as with the guilt phase, the prosecutor first makes an opening statement, and the defense may do so thereafter or at the beginning of its case. The State then presents evidence to establish beyond a reasonable doubt the existence of at least one aggravating circumstance (§ 565.032, RSMo.) that renders the defendant death penalty-eligible. The defense then has the opportunity to produce evidence in mitigation.


  3. Pre-sentence Investigation

      Before sentencing, the state Board of Probation and Parole may investigate to determine if the defendant is an appropriate candidate for probation (if eligible) and may make a recommendation to the judge.

      Victims are asked to make victim impact statements describing how the crime has impacted their lives. The statements will be included in the pre-sentence investigation report.


  4. Motion For New Trial

      A new trial may be granted upon "good cause shown" by the defendant. The motion for new trial must be filed within ten days from the date of conviction unless the trial court grants a one-time extension of fifteen additional days.


  5. Sentencing

      For each crime, the statute creating the offense specifies a range of punishment, such as "five to fifteen years imprisonment."

      If the defendant was sentenced by a jury, i.e., the jury recommended a sentence, the judge cannot increase the punishment specified by that jury but can reduce it. In some cases where the defendant has prior criminal convictions, the jury does not consider punishment. Instead, the judge decides the sentence to be imposed.

      The defendant may be jailed, imprisoned, or placed on probation. While the state Department of Corrections operates and is responsible for offenders sentenced to a term of imprisonment of one year or more within the state prison system, a sentence of less than one year generally is served in a county jail. If a defendant is sentenced to imprisonment, that sentence will be stated as a specific term of days or years, such as "fifteen years imprisonment." The court may, however, suspend execution of the sentence and place the defendant on probation subject to specified conditions. In addition, and generally only upon a guilty plea, the court may decide not to sentence the defendant to a term of imprisonment but to suspend imposition of the sentence and place the offender on probation. The defendant also may be ordered to make restitution, to pay court courts, and to pay a fine.

      Under Missouri law, § 558.011, RSMo sets the applicable terms of imprisonment, and § 560.016, RSMo provides for any applicable fines. A sentence on a felony conviction includes both a term of incarceration and a conditional release term, unless the conviction is on a dangerous felony (including arson in the first degree, assault in the first degree, forcible rape, forcible sodomy, kidnapping, murder in the second degree, and robbery in the first degree), or involves the defendant's fourth or subsequent commitment to the Department of Corrections. The conditional release term refers to the conditional discharge of the inmate by the Missouri Board of Probation and Parole, subject to certain conditions. The length of the conditional release term is determined by the length of the sentence:

      • one-third for terms of 9 years or less
      • 3 years for terms between 9-15 years
      • 5 years for terms of more than 15 years

      An inmate may be incarcerated beyond the length of the conditional release date if certain conditions are met. In addition, the trial court may extend a sentence in the case of offenders who have pled guilty or been found guilty of committing one or more felonies, is found to be a dangerous offender as defined by § 558.016.4 RSMo, or is found to be a persistent sexual offender, having previously been convicted of forcible rape, statutory rape in the first degree, forcible sodomy, statutory sodomy in the first degree, or an attempt to commit any of those offenses.

      Multiple sentences run concurrently (at the same time) unless the court specifies that they are to run consecutively (one after the other). But in the case of multiple offenses including the felony of rape, forcible rape, sodomy, forcible sodomy, or an attempt to commit any of those offenses, the sentence(s) on the sexual offense(s) must run consecutive to the other offense(s).

      A defendant will receive credit for the time he or she served in jail or prison awaiting trial, to the extent that the incarceration was not time served on a different, unrelated offense.

      The victim or family of a deceased victim has the right to give a victim impact statement prior to sentencing, § 557.041 and to be present and to make a statement at the sentencing hearing. § 595.209, RSMo



CHALLENGES TO THE CONVICTION AND/OR SENTENCE
  1. Direct Appeal

      The State cannot appeal from a judgment of acquittal. If found guilty, under Missouri law the defendant must appeal the decision within ten days after the court officially pronounces the sentence and enters the sentence and judgment. In capital cases, i.e., where the death penalty has been imposed, the appeal goes directly to the Missouri Supreme Court. Otherwise the appeal goes to the Missouri Court of Appeals, either the Eastern, Western, or Southern District. The Attorney General for the State of Missouri represents the State in all felony appeals. Any victim desiring to be apprised of the appellate procedure and case status must make the request in writing to the Missouri Attorney General's Office. If the appeal is from a misdemeanor conviction, the prosecuting attorney for the particular county that the conviction arose will represent the State. Upon affirmation of the judgment of conviction and sentence, the defendant can present to the United States Supreme Court federal constitutional claims in a petition for writ of certiorari (also referred to as a "cert. petition"), but such review is entirely discretionary.


  2. Post-conviction Motions Under Missouri Supreme Court Rules 24.035 and 29.15

      Missouri Supreme Court Rule 24.035 (applicable in the case of a guilty plea) and Missouri Supreme Court Rule 29.15 (applicable in the case of a guilty verdict following a jury or bench trial), provide the exclusive remedy for seeking post-conviction relief from a judgment of conviction and sentence alleged to violate the constitution and laws of Missouri, the constitution of the United States, a sentence in excess of the statutory maximum, or that the sentencing court was without jurisdiction to impose sentence. If a direct appeal was brought, the post-conviction motion must be filed within ninety days after the appellate court issued its mandate; if no appeal was filed, the motion for post-conviction relief must be filed within ninety days of delivery to the Department of Corrections. An appeal from the denial of a post-conviction motion may also be brought before either the Missouri Supreme Court of the Court of Appeals, dependent upon whether the case involves a sentence of death or not, and must be filed within ten days of the judgment becoming final (i.e., forty days from denial of the motion). A petition for writ of certiorari may also be filed in the United States Supreme Court following affirmation of the denial of the post-conviction motion. Again, review is entirely discretionary.


  3. Other State Court Proceedings - following are the most common proceedings under Missouri law that are brought to challenge a conviction or sentence after the affirmation of the judgment of conviction and denial of post-conviction relief. These proceedings are not a substitute for the exclusive remedy provided under Rules 24.035 and 29.15 for post-conviction relief.

    1. Missouri Supreme Court Rule 91 - State Habeas Corpus

        A proceeding which may be brought by any person restrained of his or her liberty within the state of Missouri to inquire into the cause of such restraint. The petition must be filed initially in the circuit court of the county in which the offender is incarcerated, which is not necessarily the county from which the conviction was obtained.

    2. Missouri Supreme Court Rule 94 - Proceeding in Mandamus

        An extraordinary writ or order issued by a court, which compels the performance of a ministerial act or mandatory duty where there is a clear legal right in the party bringing the action and a corresponding duty in the defendant.

    3. Missouri Supreme Court Rule 97 - Proceeding in Prohibition

        An extraordinary writ or order issued by a superior court preventing an inferior court from acting in excess of its jurisdiction.

    4. Missouri Supreme Court Rule 87 - Declaratory Judgment

        A judicial determination of a justifiable controversy between the parties which adjudicates the rights and status of the litigants.


  4. Federal Habeas Corpus Proceedings

      Under federal law, i.e., 28 U.S.C. § 2254, a state offender may seek federal habeas corpus relief. A petition in the federal court must raise the ground that the petitioner is in custody in violation of the United States Constitution or laws or treaties of the United States. Where the petition challenges the state conviction and/or sentence, the named prison custodian and therefore the state, are represented by the Attorney General for the State of Missouri. Under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d), the petition for writ of habeas corpus generally must be filed with the United States District Court within one year from when the state conviction became final. Regarding capital cases, the petition must be filed within 180 days after the conviction became final, if the state has established certain requirements by law pertaining to the legal representation of indigent capital offenders in post-conviction proceedings. Previously there were no time limitations for which an offender could bring a habeas petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254.

      Habeas laws adopted in 1996 also expressly preclude and restrict the filing of multiple petitions challenging the same conviction and sentence.

      A habeas petitioner is generally not entitled to an evidentiary hearing on his claims for relief. Where a hearing is granted, the inquiry is upon the allegations of constitutional violations in relation to the conviction and/or sentence, and the crime victim does not have a legally recognized right to notice of the hearing or to address the court.

      In the event that the federal district court were to "grant the writ," the offender is not automatically released from prison. Generally the court issues an order directing that the state either begin trial proceedings against the petitioner within a specified number of days, typically sixty, or discharge the petitioner at the expiration of that time.

      Procedurally, the Assistant Attorney General representing the State of Missouri, upon the grant of the writ, can request that the district court reconsider its opinion. Should the court deny that motion, the State can seek a stay of execution of the judgment granting the writ, thus in effect suspending the court's order. An appeal challenging the district court's decision is then taken to the United States Court of Appeals. In Missouri, such an appeal would be taken before the Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit.

      The Eighth Circuit, upon receiving the State's notice of appeal, sets a briefing schedule. The State then has the opportunity to file a brief with the appellate court presenting the reasons why the district court's decision is erroneous. The Eighth Circuit may but need not hear oral arguments in the case. A panel of three judges reviews the appeal.

      In the event that the U.S. Court of Appeals affirms or upholds the decision of the lower court granting the writ, the State may then request that the panel rehear the appeal or that the entire court hear the case, but only if counsel has a reasoned belief that certain standards for requesting such relief are present. If the State ultimately does not prevail, a petition for writ of certiorari may be filed in the United States Supreme Court. Review by the Supreme Court is entirely discretionary.

      If the district court denies the habeas corpus petition, the offender must then obtain the permission of either the district court or the federal court of appeals to proceed with appellate review. If granted, the procedure in terms of briefing, argument, and post-decision motions are the same.



PAROLE
  1. Minimum Prison Terms

      For offenders who have previously been convicted of one or more felonies, he or she must serve a specific percentage of the new sentence; the number of prior convictions determines the percentage of time that must be served before the inmate is eligible for parole consideration (§ 558.019, RSMo).

      Any defendant convicted of committing a dangerous offense as defined in § 556.061, RSMo (arson in the first degree, assault in the first degree, forcible rape, forcible sodomy, kidnapping, murder in the second degree, robbery in the first degree), must serve a minimum of 85% of the sentence imposed.

      In the event that the minimum eligibility date exceeds the conditional release date, the offender is not entitled to conditional release.

  2. Parole Hearings

      A prisoner will most likely be eligible for parole consideration before the sentence is completed. The Missouri Board of Probation and Parole is responsible for deciding when a Missouri prisoner is eligible for parole, based on various guidelines, as defined by statute (§ 217.690) and regulations, and when that prisoner will actually be released. The inquiry is upon whether there is a reasonable probability that the offender can be released without detriment to the community or to himself, and whether the Board of Probation and Parole believes that the offender is able and willing to fulfill the obligations of a law-abiding citizen. A victim or the family of a deceased victim may attend the parole hearings or otherwise provide information to the Board regarding the crime and request that parole be denied. A prisoner who has been granted parole will be given a date when he or she will be released, referred to as the "presumptive release date." Upon actual release on parole, the offender remains in the legal custody of the Department of Corrections and is subject to the Board's orders.

      Challenges to the Board's decision not to grant parole are generally in the form of a state petition for writ of habeas corpus or petition for declaratory relief. Because of the discretion that the Board is afforded by statute, the inquiry generally is whether the Board complied with applicable procedures.

      If not subject to a minimum term of imprisonment, the initial parole hearing is automatically scheduled on the following basis:


      SENTENCE LENGTH (in years) MONTHS OF INCARCERATION TO BE SERVED PRIOR TO INITIAL PAROLE HEARING
      2 ASAP
      3 ASAP
      4 4
      5 6
      6 8
      7 10
      8 24
      9 30
      10 36
      11-15 42
      16-20 60
      21-25 78
      26-30 96
      31-35 114
      36-40 132
      41-44 144
      45+ 156


This page last updated on .